![]() Singh Deo Ministery of Orissa appointed a Commission of Inquiry, consisting of Justice H.R. He found Bakshi Ghulam Mohammed guilty of abuse of power for the enrichment of the family.Īfter the General Election of 1967, when the Congress lost power in several states, it became possible to appoint Commissions of Inquiry into charges of improper conduct against Congress ministers in the states. The judge estimated the assets of the Bakshi clan to be over Rs 16,000,000. Unlike the Kairon Inquiry the charges were levelled, not by private individuals, but by the government which was, therefore, able to have its own preliminary investigation before presenting the evidence to the Commission. Besides some specific allegations, the Commission was asked to inquire into the nature and extent of the assets of the Bakshi family from the time he joined government in October 1947 till his resignation in October 1963. In January the following year, the government of Jammu & Kashmir appointed a Commission of Inquiry consisting of a former Judge of the Supreme Court, Rajagopalan Ayyangar, to probe into charges of misconduct against the State's former Chief Minister, Bakshi Ghulam Mohammed. It was tried successfully in 1958 to exonerate Sardar Pratap Singh Kairon. His technique was a party inquiry which would dutifully exonerate the colleague and leave things undisturbed. Prime Minister Nehru, however, was not pleased with the result and made little secret of his distaste for public inquiries into the misdeeds of colleagues dear to him. Justice Chagla accepted Patel's evidence against the Finance Minister's, who resigned from the cabinet. The Chairman and Managing Director of LIC were held responsible and so was TTK. Great public interest was aroused in the proceedings. Iyengar), the Chairman of the State Bank (Bhattacharya), the Chairman of LIC (Kamat), Managing Director LIC (Vaidyanathan), Mundhra and many others. Patel, the Governor of the Reserve Bank (H.V.R. ![]() Chagla of the Bombay High Court who examined in public TTK. ![]() The Inquiry was conducted by Chief Justice, M.C. Krishnamachari (TTK) denied that it was done with his approval and sought to pass the blame on the principal Finance Secretary, H.M. But the first major Inquiry under the Act was the Commission of Inquiry appointed by the Government of India to inquire into the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) purchase from Haridas Mundhra of shares in some of his concerns. The most notable of them were the ones on Krishna Menon's role in the "Jeep Scandal" by a sub-committee of the Congress Parliamentary party and by the Public Accounts Committee of Parliament. There were inquiries into public scandals before the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 was enacted. And in the length of the main article he brings into focus the country's past Commissions of Inquiry and what went wrong in their functioning. Noorani explains the details of the Commission of Inquiry Act of 1952. India already has an incoherent, trial- and-error record in inquiry commissions of the past. The spate of Commissions of Inquiry ordered by Home Minister Charan Singh into the misdeeds and malpractices during the Emergency will have to move into action fast if they are to achieve any results. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |